A Compendium of all of my Writings on the Travel Ban

Since January 27, 2017, I have written more than thee dozen blog posts, editorials, and articles about the three iterations of the travel ban. I have nothing new to say about this case until oral arguments, which I will be attending. I’ve also given hundreds of interviews with the press on the topic.

Here is a compendium of those writings for your convenience.

  1. Pretext and the Establishment Clause, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Jan. 28, 2017).
  2. Nationwide Injunction (Stay, really) issued in Darweesh v. Trump, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Jan. 28, 2017).
  3. The Procedural Aspects of “The Airport Cases,” Josh Blackman’s Blog (Jan. 29, 2017).
  4. Why Trump Had To Fire Sally Yates, Politico Magazine (Jan. 31, 2017).
  5. Washington Seeks Nationwide Injunction of Immigration Order, Relying on Argument It Opposed U.S. v. Texas, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Feb 1, 2017).
  6. Writing Opinions in Times of Conflict, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Feb 4, 2017).
  7. Instant Analysis Nationwide Injunction in Washington v. Trump, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Feb 4, 2017).
  8. The Statutory Legality of Trump’s Executive Order on Immigration, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Feb 5, 2017).
  9. Three Possible Paths to #SCOTUS for Washington v. Trump, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Feb 5, 2017).
  10. The Statutory Legality of Trump’s Executive Order on Immigration: Part II, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Feb 5, 2017).
  11. Second-Guessing on National Security, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Feb 6, 2017).
  12. The Statutory Legality of Trump’s Executive Order on Immigration: Part III, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Feb 7, 2017).
  13. The Statutory Legality of Trump’s Executive Order on Immigration: Part IV, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Feb 11, 2017).
  14. Kerry v. Din, Kleindiesnt v. Mandel, and Washington v. Trump, Josh Blackman’s Blog (Feb 11, 2017).
  15. The Ninth Circuit’s Contrived Comedy of Errors in Washington v. Trump: Part I, Lawfare (Feb. 13, 2017).
  16. The Ninth Circuit’s Contrived Comedy of Errors in Washington v. Trump: Part II, Lawfare (Feb. 14, 2017).
  17. The Legality of the 3/6/17 Executive Order, Part I: The Statutory and Separation of Powers Analyses, Lawfare (Mar. 11, 2017).
  18. The Legality of the 3/6/17 Executive Order, Part II: The Due Process Clause Analysis, Lawfare (Mar. 12, 2017).
  19. The Legality of the 3/6/17 Executive Order, Part III: The Establishment Clause, Lawfare (Mar. 15, 2017).
  20. Why Courts Shouldn’t Try to Read Trump’s Mind, Politico Magazine (Mar. 16, 2017).
  21. IRAP v. Trump: Applying The “Presumption of Regularity” in “Uncharted Territories,” Lawfare (May 9, 2017).
  22. The wrong way to assess the travel ban: Trump’s words in interviews and on the stump should not decide an appeals court’s ruling, New York Daily News (May 9, 2017).
  23. Hawaii v. Trump: What Would an “Objective Observer” Think of President Trump’s Travel Ban?, Lawfare (May 16, 2017).
  24. The Simple Answer to Judge Paez’s Question about Korematsu, Lawfare (May 19, 2017).
  25. Analysis of IRAP v. Trump Part III: The Concurring Opinions of Judges Thacker, Keenan, and Wynn, Lawfare (May 30, 2017).
  26. Analysis of IRAP v. Trump Part IV: Judge Niemeyer’s Dissent, Lawfare (June 2, 2017).
  27. Analysis of IRAP v. Trump Part V: Judge Shedd and Judge Agee’s Dissents, and the Government’s Petitions for Certiorari and Applications for Stay, Lawfare (June 2, 2017).
  28. All The President’s Tweets, Lawfare (June 5, 2017).
  29. America Needs Closure on the Travel Ban, N.Y. Times (June 11, 2017).
  30. Six Possible Options for the Supreme Court’s Review of the Travel Ban, Lawfare (June 24, 2017).
  31. The Scope of the Supreme Court’s Decision in IRAP v. Trump, Lawfare (June 27, 2017).
  32. Understanding the Supreme Court’s equitable ruling in Trump v. IRAP, SCOTUSBlog (July 12, 2017).
  33. The Solitary Executive, Foreign Policy (August 18, 2017).
  34. ‘Neutral Principles’ and the ‘Presumption of Regularity’ in the Era of Trump, Lawfare (Sept. 7, 2017).
  35. Reality Sets in for Federal Courts: The Travel Ban Was a ‘Temporary Pause’, Lawfare (Sept. 25, 2017).
  36. The Legal Resistance to President Trump, National Review (Oct. 11, 2017).
  37. A Nonchalant Conclusion to Trump v. IRAP, Lawfare (Oct. 13, 2017).
  38. The Travel Ban and the Rational Basis Test, Lawfare (Oct. 23, 2017).
  39. For Judges, ‘Legality’ Is Their Only ‘Reality’, Lawfare (Dec. 11, 2017).
  40. The Ninth Circuit Previews Why Article II Will Save The Travel Ban, Lawfare (Dec. 26, 2017).
  41. On the Judicial Resistance, Lawfare (Feb. 12, 2018).
  42. The Travel Ban, Article II, and the Nondelegation Doctrine, Lawfare (Feb. 22, 2018).

 


A Compendium of all of my Writings on the Travel Ban curated from Josh Blackman's Blog

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Commentary, Media Hits, and Events (March 5 – May 30)

Image
Here are my commentaries, media hits, and speaking engagements from March 5, 2018 through May 30, 2018. The bulk of these hits concern the CUNY protest, as well as the travel ban.   Articles Defiance and Surrender , 59 So. Texas L. Rev. (2018).   Commentary Conservative and Libertarian Lawyers in the Era of Trump , Lawfare (May 29, 2018). Dueling Cosmic Injunctions, DACA and Departmentalism , Lawfare (May 22, 2018). The Easy Way Forward on Trump v. Hawaii , Lawfare (Apr. 25, 2018). CUNY Law students heckled my talk on campus free speech , NY Daily News (Apr. 21, 2018). Students at CUNY Law Protested and Heckled My Lecture about Free Speech on Campus , National Review (Apr. 12, 2018). Testing California’s “Sanctuary Law,” Wall Street Journal (Mar. 13, 2018) (with Ilya Shapiro) ( Reproduction ). Analysis of IRAP v. Trump Part I: The Fourth Circuit’s Reliance on Pre- and Post-Inauguration Statement s, Lawfare (May 27, 2017). Analysis of IRAP v. Trump Part II: Th...
Read more

Crime and punishment roundup

Fiasco of Cliven Bundy prosecution points up that even those who break the law are entitled to a fair trial. “In the Bundy case, Judge Navarro slammed the FBI for withholding key evidence. Unfortunately, this seems to be standard procedure for the FBI.” [ James Bovard, USA Today ; Mark Joseph Stern, Slate ; earlier ] Don’t undermine structural protection Double Jeopardy Clause provides against prosecutorial overreach [ Jay Schweikert on Cato amicus brief in Currier v. Virginia] Case gives SCOTUS chance to reconsider “dual sovereignty” exception to Double Jeopardy Clause [ Ilya Shapiro on Cato certiorari brief in Gamble v. U.S.] “The room he was in happened to fall within 572 feet of a park and 872 feet of a school,” within the 1000 feet set by Tennessee law, result misery [ C.J. Ciaramella and Lauren Krisai, Reason (“Drug-free school zone laws are rarely if ever used to prosecute sales of drugs to minors. Such cases are largely a figment of our popular imagination.”)] Missed la...
Read more

Maryland toughens “cyber-bullying” law yet further

“We’re not interested in charging children or putting them in jail or fining them,” says a campaigner for Maryland’s “cyber-bullying” law, “Grace’s Law 2.0,” which is drafted to do exactly those things. “What we want to do is change the behavior so the internet is more kind,” says the same campaigner regarding the new law, which would encourage online users to turn each other in for potential 10-year prison terms over single instances of certain kinds of malicious, abusive speech, and is being billed as going farther than any other law in the country, as well as farther than the earlier Maryland law passed in 2013. Bruce DePuyt at Maryland Matters reports that Senate Judiciary Chair Bobby Zirkin (D-Baltimore County): said the 2013 law required that abusive comments be sent to the individual and be part of a pattern of conduct. With the rise of social media, that proved to be too high a hurdle, he said. Under the new law, “a single significant act can land you in trouble,” he told ...
Read more